>>614 Из двух зол я выбираю то, где множество людей имеют одинаковые возможности, а не очень малая группа людей имеет эти возможности, потому что верю в руку рыночка, что она то найдет наиболее эффективную систему устройства для социума, на отдельной территории. Хотя рыночек говорит, что в ресурсных педерациях всегда вечные диктатуры, так как это эффективнее демократии и прочей хуйни.
>>603 >собственных рабах Не вижу ничего плохого, если это полезно.
>>590 >Коммунисту печет, что у любого васяна нет государственных полномочий. Ему обидно, что чекист может подглядывать за соседом, а коммунист - не может. А как же социализм с человеческим лицом? Больше власти васянам, значит меньше власти гос-ву. Разрешать лучше, чем запрещать.
>>566 >Ты предлагаешь менять законы, чтобы государство не нападало, но сохраняло такую возможность. Ты жопой читал, не о каком сохранении речи не шло.
>Мечты о том, что противник не придет и не нападет даже если ты не можешь себя защитить вызывают желание победить "преступность". Нихуя не понял, какой-то поток сознания.
>Вот бы кто-то догадался применять принципы информационной безопасности к физическому миру. "Права человека" называется.
>>499 >Существование преступников беспокоит этатистов
>>571 >Все данные, которые собираются, будут открыты для всех, Если все логи серверов будут открыты для всех - возникнет глобальный наблюдатель, против которого бессилен Tor. Чем больше собираемых данных хранится локально, желательно в бумажном журнале - тем труднее их использовать для массовой слежки.
>>616 >Из двух зол я выбираю то, где множество людей имеют одинаковые возможности, а не очень малая группа людей имеет эти возможности Предпочитаешь, чтобы тебя мог ограбить и убить любой гражданин рашки, а не только Путин и свита, которые с большей вероятностью не станут использовать такую возможность?
>верю в руку рыночка >социализм с человеческим лицом Нужно выбрать что-то одно.
> Больше власти васянам, значит меньше власти гос-ву. Нет. Власть государства не уменьшается от появления у васяна возможностей следить за соседом, даже если васян не поддерживает государство. А если поддерживает - у государства становится еще больше власти. Власть васяна ничем не лучше власти государства. В хачевских аулах застой и рабство традиций, потому что там есть власть хачей, которые следят друг за другом, чтобы никто не нарушал традиции.
Чтобы было меньше власти государству - нужно дать васянам инструменты защиты частной жизни, а не подглядывания за другими людьми.
>>616 >Из двух зол я выбираю то, где множество людей имеют одинаковые возможности, а не очень малая группа людей имеет эти возможности, потому что верю в руку рыночка Свободный рыночек "с руками" это не одинаковые возможности, а полное отсутствие регулирования и налогообложения. Иначе "рука рыночка" это перчатка, в которой скрывается рука регулятора. Отсутствие налогообложения важнее, чем отсутствие регулирования. Собранные не рыночным путем (вымогательством налогов) деньги будут использованы для формально рыночного влияния на рынок, а регулирование может вызвать противодействие и уход в серую зону.
>в ресурсных педерациях всегда вечные диктатуры, так как это эффективнее демократии и прочей хуйни. Ресурсные территории остаются педерациями потому что грязноштанные диктатуры не эффективны и могут существовать только за счет продажи ресурсов развитым странам с рыночной экономикой.
<собственных рабах >Не вижу ничего плохого, если это полезно. >"Права человека" называется. Раб с собственными рабами остается рабом и управляет своими рабами ради пользы хозяина. Раб, которому достаточно иметь собственных рабов - плохой союзник в борьбе за собственное освобождение. Он согласен подчиняться и хочет только чтобы ему дали право командовать.
>Больше власти васянам, значит меньше власти гос-ву. Значит место государства займут васяны. Это никак не способствует задаче освобождения от чужой власти. А на практике к власти государства добавится власть васянов.
>Разрешать лучше, чем запрещать. Лучше (если цель - освободиться от чужой власти) не регулировать, а еще лучше - сделать регулирование невозможным. Разрешать - значит регулировать, меняется только правовой статус, но не стратегическая позиция.
Мои предложения по изменению правового поля актуальны только при отсутствии возможности избавиться от государственного аппарата и выйти за пределы правового поля, но при наличии возможности повлиять на изменения в законах. Отмена регулирования лучше изменений требования регулятора, но может сложиться ситуация, когда есть возможность только изменить требования регулятора, а не избавиться от них. Я не являюсь сторонником борьбы в правовом поле, но если игнорировать подобную борьбу, не предлагая альтернативы тем, кто считает, что "единственный выход через правовое поле", сосредоточившись только на уничтожении государства - направлять борьбу в правовом поле будет кто-то другой, предлагая варианты регулирования разрешение - тоже регулирование, которые более выгодны государству и в случае успеха их выдадут за победу над интересами номенклатуры. Грязноштанная мотивация "Зопретить! жадным корпорациям наживаться на персональных данных" тоже будет полезна при агитации.
Продавцов обязали сливать все данные по продажам через онлайн-кассы, а васянам дали возможность проверить, зарегистрирован ли их чек у оператора фискальных данных, чтобы за продавцами следила не только налоговая, но и васяны.
https://youtube.com/watch?v=c0_1wQO5WPc [Embed] У верунов в квартире поставили камеру, теперь судят за молитвы.
Coming soon: Вот у того чувака стоит ш2з, наверное он экстремист, ставим ему в квартиру жучок, слушаем как он знакомому по своему перешифрованному VoIP-каналу говорить такие экстремистские слова как ПИДОРАХА и разжигает ненависть к социальной группе "силовики", садим его на бутыль.
На днях стало известно, что в России создают цифровой ресурс, который поможет гражданам и государству узнать полную информацию об использовании их персональных данных. Этот портал позволит запретить нежелательные действия с личными данными.
Ресурс должен появиться уже в IV квартале этого года. Эксперты утверждают, что появление сервиса обеспечит более деликатное обращение различных компаний с данными своих пользователей. Правда, для того, чтобы сервис был результативным, организации необходимо обязать работать с ним в соответствии с законом.
Сейчас портал находится в самом начале развития. Кроме чисто технической стороны необходимо проработать и остальные — например, определиться с тем, как граждане будут узнавать об использовании их личной информации, равно как и с тем, станет ли портал государственным.
В настоящее время персональные данные граждан обрабатываются сотнями госучреждений и коммерческих компаний в разном объеме и разных системах. Чаще всего гражданин просто не знает, где и как используется его личная информация. Для того чтобы создать единую базу, придется провести огромную работу.
комментарий с хабра Давайте пофантазируем, во что это выльется на практике. Допустим, сейчас для того, чтобы оформить какой-нибудь вшивый заказ в интернет-магазине, вводим имя как зовут, мэйл, адрес доставки и номер мобильника (чтобы курьер мог связаться). Этого как-бы достаточно, но имя и номер мобилы — это уже персональные данные, которые внутри инфосистемы магазина дополняются данными о заказе. В принципе, все довольны, товар доставлен, оплачен и уже съеден, но приходит горячо (так горячо, что аж жжот) любимое государство и требует слить использование данных на специальный сервер товарища майора. Сервер как-то должен идентифицировать человечка, поэтому в принимаемых им пакетах обязательно должен быть указан либо ИНН, либо паспортные данные, а лучше и то, и другое.
Заканчивается тем, что в очередной раз захожу на сайт любимой пиццерии заказать себе пепперони, и мать честная — теперь мне без ИНН и номера паспорта ничего не продадут. То есть до «закона» я отдавал необходимый минимум данных о себе, а теперь буду отдавать значительно больше. Притом каждый раз. Даже кассирша в супермаркете, потупив глаза, будет объяснять мне, что пока я не зайду на их сайт и не дозаполню анкетку, скидочная карточка действовать не будет.
Государству (и не только, кстати, нашему) не терпится поиметь у себя полную бигдэйту. Собирать по крупицам, как делают это обычные игроки, товарищу майору (ТМ) не с руки. Поэтому нажимаем волшебную педальку (которая насилие), и пусть все сами в клювике несут. Иначе штраф. Или бан. А ТМ будет ещё ковырять карандашом в зубах и привередничать: «Ваша ежедневная выгрузка ПД не принята по причине того, что состав данных не соответствует „изменениям и дополнениям“, выпущенным позавчера. Во избежание штрафа рекомендуем до завтра устранить несоответствия».
>>644 Глядишь и доставки перестанут требовать имя и телефон. Имя им и так не особо нужно, легко заменяется псевдонимами/номерами, которые они и сами генерить могут. Телефон во многих случаях может быть заменён мессенджерами и даже сраный телеграм лучше телефона, а кроме невостребованности ничто не мешает работать с более приличными. Хотя хуй там конечно, продаванам похуй, сделают как требуют и даже заморачиваться с обходом не будет, ведь потребителю тоже похуй.
>>645 >Глядишь и доставки перестанут требовать имя и телефон Для удобства сделают телефон идентификатором человечка - донора персональных данных, чтобы требование ИНН не вызывало желание искать обходные пути и не напоминало стаду, что одна целей сбора информации - контроль за расходами налогоплательщика.
>сделают как требуют и даже заморачиваться с обходом не будет Фактически уже сделали и сливают оператору фискальных данных всю информацию по чеку. А для васянов сделали приложение для смартфона с регистрацией по номеру телефона, через которое можно просканировать qr-код чека и удостовериться, что продавец не обманывает государство и сообщил о продаже в налоговые органы.
>>128442 それは、このような熱烈なキスは、日本では人前ではしてはいけない恥ずべき行為だからです It is because such an ardent kiss is the crime that you must not do in public in Japan ポルノは恥ずかしいことを行うもの The pornography performs a shameful thing 隠すべきものを見せることですので It is to show the thing which you should hide このようなキスのやり方になるのです It becomes the way of such a kiss
>>128470 I always wonder, just how do normalfags even function? Like seriously, what is wrong with normalfaggots? I wish that popular "Human NPCs" study that's being memed around was actually done properly and not half assed with a sample size of 30. Nevermind the fact that there's also the issue that they didn't even disclose the ethnicity of the samples or much of the questioning procedures.
1. One woman killed her husband's sister. They shared an small apartment and had lots of arguments. Allegedly after a fight over inheritance, the woman killed the relative, then sealed the dead body with concret in her room. Somehow her husband didn't notice his sister didn't come out from her room for three days, until the company the sister worked for began to worry for her. 2. A controversial writer died. He had been a political prisoner in martial law era and a lawmaker later. 3. Coal power plant expansion program got into controversy.
>Once a master carpenter named Shih was travelling with his apprentice on his way to the state of Chi. When they arrived in Chu Yuan village they passed a huge old oak tree sheltering the village shrine. It was huge, large enough to fit several thousand oxen under its branches. It was 100 spans and towered over everything else in the village with its lowest branches a full 80 feet in the air. These branches were so large they could have been made into a dozen boats. Many people were standing under it, their necks craned as they tried to see the top. But the master carpenter did not even turn his head as they passed it; but walked on without stoping for a moment. >His apprentice took one look at the immense tree and ran after his master saying: “Since I first took up the ax to train with you Master, I have never seen a tree as magnificent. Yet you do not even look at it, much less stop. Why is this?” >The carpenter said, “Enough! Not another word about this tree! Its wood is useless. A boat made from its timber would sink; a coffin would rot before you could put it into the ground; any tool you made from it would snap. It has too much sap in it to make a door, and a beam made from its wood would be full of termites. Altogether it is a completely useless tree and that is why it has lived so long.” >One night, after he returned home, the ancient tree came to the carpenter in a dream and spoke to him. “What are you comparing me to,” it asked, “useful trees like cherry, apple, pear, orange, citron and all the other useful trees? Yet for these trees, as soon as the fruit is ripe they are stripped; their branches are broken and torn off. It is their usefulness that causes them so much abuse. Instead of living out the years heaven has given them they are cut off halfway through. So it is for living things. This is why I have worked so long to cultivate the spirit of uselessness. I was almost cut down several times but I have been able to attain a great level of uselessness and this has been very useful to me. If I had been more useful I would never have attained the great age that I have, and grown so large. >“The two of us are similar. We are both just beings in the world. How is it that we go about judging other beings? You, an old and worthless man, about to die, how can you judge me and call me worthless?” >Shih the carpenter awoke then and spent a long time lying in his bed trying to understand this strange dream. Later, when he shared his dream with his apprentice the young man said, “If this ancient tree is so interested in being useless why has it allowed itself to become part of the village shrine?” >His master said, “It is only pretending to be a shrine. It is its way of protecting itself. Even though its timber is useless, if it were not a shrine it would have been cut down long ago. It is totally different from other trees. You cannot hope to understand it!” Were Daoists the ultimate NEETs?
They first introduced the Qinghai-Tibet railway: The engineering challenges with the tundra, the efforts to make rooms for local animals, and how the train collects all the waste without polluting the environment. They also emphasized how the region is restricted, and that Taiwanese media needs permits and internal passports to report in the region.
They then reported on a government program of Planting trees to stop the desertification. There were dark skinned Tibetan engineers working in a Greenhouse to incubate seedlings of a species. They say the greenhouse can accelerate the seedlings growth. They also interviewed a local man who collect garbage and plant the seedlings around his village. The soil looked like soft sandstone.
They then visited Lhasa, and the reporters had bad altitude sickness. They reported that the 4G signal coverage was good up there and WeChat pay worked well. For example they visited a mountain monument and there were some Tibetan guys collecting fees for photo. The business was done with WeChat pay. They then visited a bottle water factory called 5100. The factory was by a glacier river at elevation of 5100m. They reported about how hard it was to set up a bottling plant and how it avoided draining.
Finally they reported in Lhasa. They showed a pearl milk tea shop, and interviewed a businessman from Inner Mongolia. The guy said all these tourists made Tibetans understand the beauty of their culture and now they have to market their culture. They also reported that Tibetans also visit the cafe to have British style milk tea. That's the end of the report.
>>69432 Please expand on this or provide information with sources. I'm Muslim and I believe one of the only events left to happen, which our prophet foretold, other than the end of times events is the Malhama (great battle) which will kill 99/100 people on Earth. The Hopi religion (potentially) says that the destruction of the world by war will occur after a blue star is sighted in the heavens. Is this what you're referring to?
Many Muslims believe that other religions are Islam (submission to Al-lah [Arabic for "thee God" ]), brought by other prophets, but diluted and warped by time and the devil satan. If you read the Bhavagad Gita for example, you will find it virtually identical to the Quran, yet "Hindus" don't follow their own creed. In chapter 14, Arjun goes as far as to pray to Krishna by prostration as we Muslims do. Jesus prayed the same way in the garden.
"The mysterious 11-day closure of a New Mexico solar observatory stemmed from an FBI investigation of a janitor suspected of using the facility's wireless internet service to send and receive child pornography, federal court documents showed..."
Host (manually specify): giyvshdnojeivkom.onion
Port (manually specify): 5222
Server (you may need to specify it to register an account): securejabber.me
JID (jabber id) must have the form: [email protected] Disable SSL/TLS (the connection is already encrypted by Tor)
Use Tor HOST:PORT as a SOCKS HOST:PORT in your XMPP client
>>21 >а ты сиди дальше в своей параше. Ты настолько ничтожен, что не смог придумать для себя лучшего занятия, чем посещать малоизвестные параши и уведомлять их обитателей об этом значимом для тебя событии?
BERLIN — Can Germany survive Islam? No thanks to jews who push for mass immigration in Germany such as Angela Merkel, Josef Schuster, Gregor Gysi and Anetta Kahane.
The article states: "On Saturday, about 11,000 people (8,000 right-wing and far-right protesters and about 3,000 anti-Nazis That means Antifa, according to police estimates) took to the streets of the eastern German city of Chemnitz, where the killing occurred. Eighteen people were injured, including a TV reporter who was thrown down a flight of stairs." I have no doubt in my mind Politico is pozzed.
"About 170,000 migrants enjoy “tolerated” status in Germany. A further 350,000 reside in the country with no official immigration status at all."
"Describing Islam as “an ideology of violence disguised as religion,” Sarrazin argues that if Europe doesn’t take swift action to halt Muslim migration into the EU, European society will ultimately be enveloped and destroyed by Islam." (Yet they say nothing of the disparaging and violent ideology of Judaism, who's followers pushed for this situation in the first place)
As the pozzed article continues to whine about "right wing violence", there is never any indication of it. Instead, there is only tangible violence by refugees.
"In June, the rape and murder of a 14-year-old girl, allegedly at the hands of an Iraqi asylum seeker, enraged the nation. That case followed the fatal stabbing of a 15-year-old in broad daylight at a drug store in southwestern Germany in December. This time, the suspected killer was an Afghan. Last year, refugees were suspects in about 15 percent of homicides in Germany, according to official statistics, though they account for only 2 percent of the population."
"Many of the suspects, including the Iraqi accused of stabbing the Chemnitz victim and the terrorist who drove into a Berlin Christmas market in 2016, enjoy an immigration status classified as a Duldung, or “tolerance.” That means that even though the individual’s asylum application has been denied, the government is allowing the person to remain in Germany and in many cases seek employment. The reasons for such a ruling vary, but can be as mundane as a lack of a passport, making it difficult to confirm the migrant’s nationality. About 170,000 migrants enjoy “tolerated” status in Germany. A further 350,000 reside in the country with no official immigration status at all, many of them waiting for a ruling on an asylum application. Critics say the presence of so many migrants without a bona fide legal right to remain in the country proves that Germany’s asylum system is a sham. History suggests that a denied asylum application presents little more than minor delay to a migrant’s quest to acquire legal immigration status in Germany. About 233,000 people whose asylum applications were rejected are currently in the country. All but 60,000 of them enjoy “tolerated” status. Angela Merkel’s government has largely avoided addressing such concerns in public, mainly because there are no easy answers." The article states, without awareness of Angela Merkel Kazmierczak's jewish origins.
"Amid the neo-Nazi attacks in Chemnitz, Merkel’s coalition has succeeded in steering the debate away from refugee violence to the dangers of the extreme right. For now. If the last few months are any indication, that tactic won’t work for long." Typical tricks by the tribe
Let me preface this by saying that I believe in a German Germany, and a European Europe. My Mother is Slovak and my Father a European mix from Britain/Ireland.
The "Jews" have been planning this open coupe, and establishment of a "New World" for thousands of years. At this point in history there is no difference between the modern Jewish inner circles in the United States and Europe at large, and the Synagogue of Satan. Their sole goal is to bring the Antichrist to Earth. He is One-Eyed, and he will pretend to be your god. He will visit every town on Earth, and resurrect your parents in front of you. He is God's greatest test upon mankind.
There is no difference between the "Illuminati" and the Jewish clique, besides the fact that the former know that they're not working to bring the Messiah to Earth. The former know that he is one-eyed and openly wish to join his ranks. The latter believe that their Messiach is coming to save them, when he has already come 2000 years ago.
The only people left on Earth who know this plan are Muslim. Muslims are fundamentally incompatible with modern Western society. The Jews don't believe they can eradicate our European race(s) (although they are trying nevertheless - why they bring in hordes of Africans). They instead plan to ride, to victory, our waves of backlash against their steadfast Muslim enemies who fought off their plan for 1400 years. To quickly excite this, they are trying to create a fiery clash between peoples who had lived peacefully in separate nations and separate continents since the Saracen hordes were repelled. Perhaps the Barbary wars. This is why the Jew used three thermonuclear weapons to vaporize the bedrock below the World Trade Centers (the subway just reopened there this year after 20 years of carrying out irradiated Earth- and placing two pools on top of the larger blast to absorb radiation). To blame it on Muslims.
Muslims believe that an 80 Flag conglomerate of European peoples will fight them with a 1 million man army because of this:
>There will be a treaty between you and Banu Asfar (The Romans), but they will betray you and will march against you with eighty banners, under each of which there will be twelve thousand troops. [Sunan Ibn Majah 4095]
I tell you this not to change your minds about collection of peoples you have written off as evil dirty and stupid, but rather so that you may contemplate these events as they happen in the future. Our prophet stated explicitly that before the end of times would occur, >that the Levant would be attacked by foreign invaders in a war without mercy, >that homosexuals will marry, >that "musical instruments will be worn on the head", >that "the dishes will be communicating continuously", >that "Arabs will compete to build the highest buildings in the land",
>>69692 >The only people left on Earth who know this plan are Muslim. No. >three thermonuclear weapons to vaporize the bedrock below the World Trade Centers Explosives, yes. Thermonuclear weapons are doubtful. >that "the dishes will be communicating continuously" What, like Siri dishes? Maybe you should have placed that after "yet to come". Now, about the enemy. In their Torah, they claim their invaders will come from "the northern parts", after Damascus is destroyed. On a flat map, that's Russia. Though on a globe, it's Turkey. This is why they persist against Syria. It's their ridiculous Isaiah prophecy to commit such an atrocity on Damascus that the entire Muslim world invades Israel. This is known as their "great tribulation", and I say let it happen. That's 8.482 million kikes less from the world population of 13.3 million, leaving under 5 million of the rats left.
>>69694 >Explosives, yes. Thermonuclear weapons are doubtful.
htt ps://w ww.youtube.com/watch?v=Ry4UWQjJnSc
htt ps://w ww.youtube.com/watch?v=cUnjbCxhXh4
They don't have the full picture, but they have a good chunk of how the buildings came down. Also, there were no planes, and the videos of them were forged on the fly for the next decade, and released by amateur computer graphics workers for plausible deniability:
>>19478 those are high level clouds you see here. they move over the mountains and don't give a fuck. but if you looked at ground measurements (generally temperature, pressure) you'd see a sharp border.
Из России надо бежать, но убегание из России непременно связано со сдачей отпечатков пальцев. Это требуется для получения визы, это нужно для паспортного контроля на таможне, это потребуют на дальнейших этапах миграции - на гринкарте прямо стоит твой отпечаток! А теперь ты ещё и должен сдавать отпечатки российским властям, чтобы получить загранпаспорт нового образца - вероятно, старый рано или поздно перестанут выпускать.
Если бы им просто хотелось идентифицировать твоё тело, они могли бы воспользоваться фотографией сетчатки. Но они собирают отпечатки пальцев, потому что это позволит ловить тебя на преступлениях. Очевидно, как только технология подешевеет, они начнут брать ДНК, а это ещё срашнее, ведь оставить его на месте преступления гораздо проще.
Никто не спорит, что на дело надо надевать перчатки и шапочку для душа. Но если тебе потребуется совершить преступление спонтанно, то у тебя не будет одного права на ошибку. Тебе предлагают добровольно от этого права отказаться взамен на пересечение границы.
>В связи с этим у меня есть вопросы. >1. Ты, вот лично ты, читатель. Ты сейчас, наверное, думаешь, "Ха-ха, каков долбоёб! Уж со мной-то такого никогда не случится", угадал? А что позволяет тебе так думать? Но я же и говорю, что серверов у меня на компе нет, ни веб-интерфейсов, ни SSH, упаси господи. Я ещё на всякий случай
иногда делаю, чтобы убедиться, что загадочных соединений и слушающих сокетов никаких не возникло.
Хотя одно отличие этого от файрвола есть: внешние соединения по UDP всё ещё возможны.
>Мамкин хацкер, я за NAT провайдера Вот это вообще замечательно, провайдеру-то мы доверяем теперь.
>>635 Зачем ей это? Слить всё можно и исходящим соединением.
Maybe we could use the /end/ for archiving comics and check them out if we are bored or we have nothing else to post for hiatuses or dead periods.
As far the way a comic should be posted, instead of posting 5 images in just one post, I think it should fit a balance: 1 image for the first (the cover) and then two pages, feeling like you are a reading a physical one. I am posting Tempest´s one for now but yayponies has all of them and we can share some opinions or make them visible over here...just because.
>>1950 >I have personally colored and edited the chapter pages and the introductory one just to add more variety instead of having complete black and white pages all the time.
Cool. Its a simple edit but it adds a nice tounch.
>Enjoy it if you are out there, anon. Praise the sun! Praise the sun indeed. I've had a busy last few days, so this is a proof of life shitposst. Will be doing full replies later, so keep the bridges crossed!
>>1951 yeah,they do. Just to add a little more variety and I had to cut the screencaps anyway,so editing them a bit didn't cost me much more additional time.
Don't think that I have had much more free time either during these two days(they have been intense in terms of progress),I am having the 2nd exams period for the next two weeks. I usually don't defend myself as brightly here than in June but I have to give it a fair shot everytime.
The bridges have always been crossed and stayed healthy during this period if you ask about them.
>>1952 >Don't think that I have had much more free time either during these two days(they have been intense in terms of progress),I am having the 2nd exams period for the next two weeks. I usually don't defend myself as brightly here than in June but I have to give it a fair shot everytime. Next week I'm thinking I'll be back to normal. Just had a lot of stuff on my plate this one, so I'll be back to keeping them crossed.
>>1962 >Just had a lot of stuff on my plate this one, so I'll be back to keeping them crossed. Alright perfect, take your time because there is a lot of stuff to reply and catch on. Don´t worry about the bridges despite the /end/ misadventure.
>>1993 I am not that good at criticizing as much as I would like because when it´s read in parts, it´s more complicated to judge it properly but I will try. Alright, let´s get with the easier part and it´s checking the update with your Cadence fic. I still take my criticism as your own questions about writing dark stuff and probably ending into edgy stuff... but I don´t see it. It feels organic, it´s always building up for a pay off or a messed up conflict but the motifs behind Candy´s actions are natural consequences of being partly yet consciously corrupted, like her enjoyment comes because of something personal for her. Dedicating a lot of time and duties for another ponies yet she doesn´t take anything for herself,could that be a reason she is selfish and puts the double mask in her routine without harming others?
Anyway, whenever you try to go for darkness... the descriptions and actions should be in theory, the cutting edge of the fic. However, I do think the questions: >Was it harmful? >Was she in denial of a problem? >Was it selfish? >Was all her desires just superficial reasons? feel way darker than the rest, those questions make me wonder more about the writer´s thoughts than her brain and you are leaking a part of a conflict you have had that was as tense as this one. You explain everything, it has a reason, so there is cohesion all the time and an aspect in which you stand out and why I like this story more than the rest is: feeling immersed in those descriptions. Sure, it will feel like filler for some readers but you do find a balance between moving on and an insightful philosophy of going through different tones of grey. I can´t guess which decision the protagonist is going to do. I imagine a few ones but the results could easily differ.
All in all, the fic hasn´t lowered the bar at any moment and you seem to know darkness pretty well despite being written at different periods, but instead of transmitting completely the in your face part, you go through a passive yet tense-comfort zone (were you inspired by the comforts of darkness?)
By the way, the edit helps to know when this happens because the argument could happen during the day as well and then, she leaves secretly as always.
>>1964 >>1972 surprisingly enough, from a spam shitpost, I can imagine Twilight saying those lines and visiting the bats with that mindset. Not to mention that she has gone through these situations with The Cutie Remark or Shadow Play. I do post this first because as soon as I read it, I actually imagined her being the actual spammer and going through zones she shouldn´t have visited for a message of friendship. Neat pick.
The 1st post brings the philosophy you have shared through the Cadence fics and the /end/. This one is actually the closest one to the edgy lines such as: >Why shouldn't I just kill you now? >Tell me why I shouldn't kill you now where you stand? on and /end/ing mindset, this makes sense for a meta critique, even though for giving it more variety, I would say bite her, drain her and make her unconscious or transform her. These two options actually happen in the /end/, users don´t get killed nor do characters in the show (normally, AJ parents are an exception). That´s my suggestion because while you can actually sound menacing, it could probably be an overdone line. Bringing up a metaphor or something spices up a little more. However, I do appreciate that you mix that edge with a punch line: >I actually think I can answer that last one: because questions can kill. not only the negative response comes because of denial and reject but a recommendation from the bats that innocent outsiders could hear or suffer consequences they wouldn´t want in retrospect. It could also be interpreted as a social criticism because extremists, SJW or /pol/tards don´t like their ideas to be questioned.
In fact, now that I am pointing this out, the 2nd part does bring a hint for social commentary and our mindset whenever we post in the /end/:
>"All of this is the result of the truth." and sadly it is. If we weren´t posting with down to earth posts and trust coming from the inside of both posters. Yet:
>"Lies are better, especially when they keep pones safe and alive.'
>>2002 >"Evil, pain and suffering, that is all the truth brought me." while it sound edgy as hell, I personally can detect that this comes because of the social media dissentious thoughts from us. We don´t like the mainstream mentality, so they think we are insane for not following the same things they do, so we become the crazy ones for standing up as an unpopular minority nobody has heard about.
>"Some questions aren't meant to be asked." >"Deep questions especially!" deep questions that are actually private. On the internet, you cannot go so innocently as you would do with others because who knows who will stalk you in the future. There will be a lot of accounts and more info about others but what matters it´s your own safety. While it sounds dim, it´s at its core, a well thought strategy for preventing irreversible consequences.
I will say that any outsider wouldn´t get interpret this fic as I do because despite the edgy words faced in the surface, when you dig a little bit deeper, you get a social commentary. It´s like an inside fic, dedicated for the /end/ itself and not to be understood by any other who doesn´t get why we post like this.
Congratulations for taking a meaningless message that breaks the rules(spam) and drive it into a meta zone that encourages some thoughts about what the /end/ is actually about.
I don´t like ratings but while your Cadence fic pioneered this trend and make it greater, you show the results and how you can make an envelope green for such little things, fitting into your territory that fast out of nowhere.
Not sure if it´s healthy to consider this as your standard and hold the comforts of darkness, but you sure seem to get comfortable at writing this content. You work as if darkness takes like a 65% of it, 20% of ambience and 15% dedicated to core questions that are not meant to be dark but asking the root of your own ideas. Probably you feared yourself at first back in Febraury because you thought you would go like 100% a la Shadow the Hedgehog mode but what I find doesn´t come close to that style.
Like a phoenix, she gets revived until the end of our days. The first princess to appear into this generation, the first princess who started the wild ride back in December 2017 and the one who will see our paths ending.
Call her majesty, call her princess, call her mentor of harmony, call her troll or just call her Celestia. She is raising the sun everyday, always there to shine in front of us with loyalty.
This is the first official thread dedicated to her. Post any pics, greens or content related about her (her sister is welcome as well) by following these two rules:
1.One image per post if possible so we appreciate any picture of her more than posting them all at once. 2. Always follow this line:
>>29360 1. Make sure you have the stated dependencies installed.
2. There is one implicit dependency that is not listed in the README: you need autotools for the build system. You'll need at least autoconf and automake.
3. Then follow the 3 step instruction in the README.
>>29365 the fact that you are so hang up on version.sh (which is a totally irrelevant script only used internally as part of the build process) makes me suspect you are very newfriend and doing something wrong
since you mention that you now have a config.log (typically output by the configure script, which is created by autoreconf, called by bootstrap) I'm guessing that the bootstrap script did succeed
there should have been a message in your terminal telling you why configure failed (I'm guessing it did)
have a look inside config.log, the same error message should appear there
probably missing dependencies
Today I had to bury the 6th dead bird this year. Not even this year, this summer! I would say I never ever buried this much but frankly before this I had to do this only twice in my whole life. I dunno what's going on with them. It would be easier to just dump them into the dumpster but frankly I rather spend some energy and give them an ok final rest. During digging I came across a very interesting archaeological findings: this tank on picrels. It wasn't mine and not any of my pals owned such or even played around that spot in our childhood so I suppose one of my family members owned this there are some possibilities. What Bernd think what type of tank is this? I think it has the Sherman looks.
Also this can be a general vehicle/weapons thread as well.
So we didn't become BFF of Germany especially after the rejections Hitler got. That was the job of Romania at that time. It was bigger than Hungary with larger population, stronger economy, larger army and - most importantly - more oil. They also had a beef with the Soviet Union which came in handy as tensions cranked up between the two countries as events went on. The Soviet stepped forward with an idea and declared they were willing to support our territorial claims as they also gave similar demands to Romania. We refused the common action, the anti-communist sentiments were too strong for this. Nevertheless our military gained enough strength that our diplomats could operate with the threat of an open armed conflict against the Romanians. This was a great big minus in the eye of the Brits and caused much problems in Berlin too. In general the Hungarian-Romanian relations were an aching pimple on Hitler's buttcheek throughout the whole war. Not just that they had to keep some other units between the two nations' troops as they started to shoot at each other if they got near but after the Second Vienna Award which supposed to solve the enmity a constant small scale war had been going on - until the Romanians switched sides - with regular raids, small arms fire, and mortar shelling. As far as I know during the negotiation of the Award it became clear that the Italians have less and less control over the events and whatever will happen in the future the Germans will be the deciding party.
So by the Second Vienna Award (1940 august) which divided Transylvania it became obvious that the Germans will be the deciding factor in the questions of the lands along the Danube. Italians had only South Balkan and African interests, France didn't really exist no more, Britain retreated from the continent tho she reserved for herself the right of judging other countries as if she was still a world power and the Soviet felt like lepers for the nations around here to allow them to have a say in what's going on here. So dealing with Hitler finally become inevitable for us but still tried to give way for the voice of neutrality which had even less credibility after joining the Tripartite act, the invasion of Yugoslavia and finally it become totally empty when we joined to the attack on the SU. But it was enough to make the German leadership suspicious toward us and they also knew about every diplomatic approaching of ours towards Britain. Germans also didn't like that Jews could live in relative safety on the Hungary, in comparison Romania took care her Jews between '41-43 or so.
While there wasn't any pressure from Germany which forced us to attack the SU and it was a voluntary action after that they continuously urged us to ramp up the war effort and send more troops and equipment to the front. Our leadership was cautious in this. What we had wasn't much and they tried to preserve what they could in case of an post-war settlement would need to be done so we wouldn't stand there without an army like before Trianon. It's a myth tho that we sent the 2nd Hungarian army underequipped (albeit it was highly understaffed/undersized/underpowered compared to a German army) and this event the sending of the 2nd Hun. army in '42 April-June started the process of handing over German war materials (first mainly simple AT guns not the self-propelled types and not necessarily German but French or Belgian for example, then even airplanes).
The destruction of this army in '43 January was a shock and compelled our diplomacy to probe Britain what's their opinion about a peace treaty. We openly expressed that we wouldn't fight against American, British and Polish troops if they happened to be launch a campaign towards our little corner of the world but would fight fiercely against Soviet, Romanian and Yugoslavian forces. But this compelled the Germans in autumn to prepare an occupation plan against Hungary which they executed in '44's spring. Then in October Horthy made a pointless effort to leave the war - as our troops kept fighting - which led to his abduction by the Germans and the Hungarist takeover. By this time the front was in Hungary - mostly thanks for the Romanian switcharoo during the summer - and there were no more question about stopping and relations didn't matter anymore at all. Germans gave what they could or judged they could hereafter.
So yeah. It was a bumpy ride with the Germans. From their viewpoint we weren't the most trustworthy ally and our leadership knew the Germans also were willing to go as far as their interests reached. They were an aggressively expansive force which couldn't be defied but there were points which allowed cooperation and compared to all the other powers they were the only ones present in the region, the region which we needed and wanted to change to our advantage. They had to make do with us, especially after all the other allies of theirs proved to be utter garbage. Them granting us their armament originated from more of a necessity than generous intention.
It's interesting to note that as they organised new SS units with foreign crew our two divisions couldn't even get enough SS uniforms, lot of the soldiers had to use their old ones from whatever Hungarian unit they served previously. A bunch of them applied to the SS in the hopes they get better equipment so they could actually contribute to the fighting. However most of them got nothing. Memoirs say - for example - a unit of theirs retreated to the west in Silezia (as they were transported to the area of Neuhammer) as the front approached and they went by an armory where they asked for weapons, they were denied on the basis that the counterattack soon will come and then the Germans will need those. The counterattack never came and the armory had to be blown up so the Red Army couldn't get its hands on it.
"To help identify and prevent fraud, information about how you use your device, including the approximate number of phone calls or emails you send and receive, will be used to compute a device trust score when you attempt a purchase. The submissions are designed so Apple cannot learn the real values on your device. The scores are stored for a fixed time on our servers."
APPLE is now assigning trust ratings to iPhone users, based on your phone call and email habits.
The new ratings were added as part of the latest iOS 12 update, which rolled out to users on Monday, September 17.
Apple's new system was revealed after the company updated its iTunes policy page on the official website.
According to the iPhone maker, Apple builds a score based on the number calls and emails you send and receive – to help spot fraudulent transactions made using your device.
"To help identify and prevent fraud, information about how you use your device, including the approximate number of phone calls or emails you send and receive, will be used to compute a device trust score when you attempt a purchase," Apple explained.
I saw this news in like 2014. Still use iphone lol... i never use the phone though or if I do act like someone else. I mean every OS is keylogged and everyone has some smartphone in their pocket with high fidelity mics, cameras pointing everywhere so everyone's acting like they're in a movie. Even some ppl who move somewhere secluded they make a vlog about it and make their whole life public so they wouldn't feel left out. You can't go anywhere anymore where ppl don't carry around devices if the whole of humanity stops using them then we might have a chance for privacy once again.
>>12803 >everyone has some smartphone in their pocket with high fidelity mics, cameras pointing everywhere
Count me a rare acception then, I never purchased a smartphone and never plan to either. I have a flip phone made for senior citizens (jitterbug) with dirt cheap service. All I can use it for is making calls, but thats all I need a phone for anyway.
>>12809 I have had a Smartphone, though I didn't use it for staying in contact with people, just for navigation, timer, clock, note-taking, some shitty games (Tetris). I had Wifi almost always turned off, if Wifi was turned on I still had a firewall (AFWall+), and everything I installed was from F-Droid(.org). Whenever I didn't need my Smartphone I took out the battery and placed it far away. But seriously in modern society there isn't a household that doesn't have one or more smartphones present (unless you're like yourself or me and live alone). I know for a fact that there's at least one App installed, or system that has the capability of making microphone recordings or take pictures and utilizing that to spy on its users and the surrounding people. So I'm always careful not to say too much (I already did) whenever I'm around Smartphones, it's fucking annoying and no-one takes me seriously even though many companies that make Apps admit to spying on its users through microphones and cameras. I can understand why one would want to ignore such a thing, because it is almost a requirement for living in modern society, and there is no good solution for most people.
I've been considering changing the way endchan handles boards. I think it's obvious at this point that completely free board creation and completely soverign BOs doesn't really work; judging from 8chan you just get a massive graveyard of unused boards with none of the independence people were raving about back in 2014. Basically you get redchanit. On the other hand I think it's self-evident that letting users moderate themselves and have input on board creation is a good idea. I want to see what you guys think about it, but here's what I'm thinking of as a broad-strokes plan right now:
>1. Nuke all the zero-post boards so the site looks like less of a ghost town >2. Start compiling a list of boards to keep >3. Turn off board creation for normal accounts, set up a process for topic splitting (where there's enough traffic for a topic to justify its own board; think /tg/ splitting off of /b/ in the ancient days of 4chan) and refugees from other sites to get their own boards >4. Add a "don't be a shit BO or you're getting ejected" clause to the global rules >5. Delete the small and dead boards that didn't make the list from 2, giving plenty of warning so people can archive their favorite threads
I think that this way we'll get some of the promised benefits that the "redchanit" model was supposed to give imageboards (BOs that actually give a shit, a board list that reflects posting activity) and not the bullshit.
NONE OF THIS IS GUARANTEED TO HAPPEN. THIS IS JUST A TEST BALLOON AT THIS STAGE.
>>9923 Seems like a troll thanks for confirming that. I remeber snakedude wanted the users to fund the site and we should keep doing that as sparse as it is but have you considered putting non intrusive ads like 4chan and 8chan to get some self sustainability? I don't see how it would be as much of a change as potentially considering locking board creation.
>>9920 how about you just shut up already and mind your own beeswax? if you don't like someone's board then simply refuse to participate and move on. there are plenty of other boards that have nothing to do with those you hate so much.
>>9928 >why dont you mind your own business <spams that persons board repeatedly i doubt you ever realized it but all the botspam of the past year that occurred in places you post happened after your stupid antispam shit showed up places they shouldn't be
>>9929 Thats because the tranny spammer was posting pictures of dicks all over the place FIRST, and it was all over the front page. Someone has to clean that stuff so I did, with pics of non-nude teen girls and female models. Big fucking deal, right? How dare I not accept dick pics all over the front page of Endchan, leave it be! Is that what you suggest?
>>9930 And even when I did clean the front page up, I never spammed boards into oblivion like the dick-lover did. I was very considerate not to annoy the hell out of people, unlike the tranny spammer who made it a personal goal to annoy people.
>>18846 Well yea, I think agnosticism is the only really logical thing one can pick unless you feel you've had what you feel is an honest religious experience. But I wasn't the one you were initially reponding to I was just playing devil's advocate.:^)
>>18848 Even then you can't ever trust a religious experience because they can be explained by science/probability/neurology/evolution, and tend to contradict one another depending on the cultures people have them in. Hume's skepticism categorically destroys that kind of evidence, he showed religious "evidence" is never evidence.
>>18850 You can't trust someone else having one but if someone really feels they had one there's no arguing about it really once they believe it. Of course it isn't evidence in the grand scheme of things but try explaining that to the person once they already believe it.
>>18851 >>18850 I treat religion the same as I do faggotry. That is to say as long as they don't try forcing onto other people of flaunting it out in public deliberately then I don't care, they can believe whatever the hell they want. So can fags as long as they stay in the closet and don't jump out in front of you waving a pare of dildos. Know what I'm saying? Keep to yourselves and everything will be fine.
"Canada has now joined the Netherlands in lobbying the World Medical Association to change its longstanding position in opposition to assisted suicide."
"As I (author:Jonathon van Maren) described in my 2016 book The Culture War, physicians in the Netherlands have begun to both advocate and implement the practice of harvesting organs from euthanized patients. The medical journal Applied Cardiopulmonary Pathophysiology published a description of how this is carried out in 2011:" "Donors were admitted to the hospital a few hours before the planned euthanasia procedure. A central venous line was placed in a room adjacent to the operating room. Donors were heparinized [a drug to maintain organ viability] immediately before a cocktail of drugs was given by the treating physician who agreed to perform the euthanasia. The patient was announced dead on cardiorespiratory criteria by 3 independent physicians as required by Belgian legislation for every organ donor…The deceased was then rapidly transferred, installed on the operating table, and intubated [in preparation for organ removal]"
"Ethicist Wesley J. Smith of the Center for Bioethics and Culture responded with horror at the time:" "Ponder the enormity of what was done here. Four people—who were not otherwise dying—were killed and then swiftly wheeled into a surgery suite to have their organs removed. Three of the donors were struggling with neuromuscular disabilities—people who often face social isolation and discrimination—and one was mentally ill. In a particularly bitter irony, the latter patient was a chronic self-harmer, the “treatment” for which was a willing professional team ready to administer the ultimate harm." "That’s just the beginning. Prominent voices among the medical elite have called for the overturning of the “dead donor rule”—the ethical backbone of organ transplant medicine requiring that a patient die naturally from injury or illness before vital organs can be procured. These advocates argue that consent should be the primary ethical concern and criteria for organ harvesting—not that a donor is dead. Thus if living patients or their surrogates give the okay, doctors should be allowed to euthanize by means of live harvesting."
"Two doctors from Ontario’s Western University along with a bioethicist from Harvard Medical School, Robert Truog, are already advocating that Canadian laws and medical protocols be changed so that organ donation can be paired with euthanasia in Canada, as well. Euthanasia, a report on their proposal notes, “offers significant advantages for transplant surgeons” – if the customary delay where the physicians wait for blood circulation to cease in order to ensure that any organ donation takes place after cardiac death takes place is done away with. In that short period of time, which may be only several minutes, the “quality of the organs declines,” and thus if “they were removed in a coordinated operation from a euthanasia patient, they would be as fresh as possible.”"
"Several very important changes would need to take place before these coordinated operations could begin to take place in Canadian hospitals. First, they noted, the “staff of intensive care wards are trained to keep people alive; in organ donation after euthanasia they would have to kill the patient. At the moment, too, a firewall exists between the staff handling withdrawal of life support and the staff handling organ donation so that patients are not killed for their organs. But with legalised euthanasia, there will be no need for the firewall.” Read those words again carefully, and let them sink in."
"Other significant changes would include doing away with the “dead donor” rule that has so long been essential to medical institutions. Canadian law also stipulates that a death by euthanasia is, by definition, a death “caused by the administration of a ‘substance,’” which would need to be changed so that death could instead be caused by “organ retrieval.” Of course, some medical professionals would presumably object, and so the authors of this proposal recognize that something will have to be done about “conscientious objectors”: Hospitals and organ-procurement organizations must therefore have protocols that allow clinicians who object to opt out. Organizations also need to consider where to draw the boundaries of legitimate conscientious objection. Does the right to opt out extend to laboratory and pharmaceutical staff? What about the disposition of these organs — should clinicians be permitted to opt out of participating in the transplantation of donated organs, and should potential recipients be informed about the source of the organs in case they may want to decline transplantation?"
"In other words, some medical professionals might not be able to object to cooperating with these medicalized killings, regardless of how appalled they might be at the idea of killing somebody by pillaging their body for “fresh organs.” Considering Canada’s track record on conscientious objection in the medical field, it seems very unlikely that physicians with functioning consciences would not be in danger of being forced into some level of cooperation with this horrifying new step into sanitized barbarism."
"At this stage, euthanasia-by-organ-donation is only a proposal, and we can hope that Canada does not continue to follow in the footsteps of the Netherlands. These practices would make an awful situation even worse, with some sick patients perhaps being encouraged to consider organ donation for healthier people—and feeling obligated to do so—or using organ donation as a way of attempting to find meaning for their lives. The potential implications are endless. For the sake of vulnerable men and women everywhere, these practices must be emphatically rejected."
Won't be crossposted. This isn't politics related.
>>12766 Absolutely anon, you nailed it. I tend to be so aggressive over there bumping legitimate news threads because almost no one ever wants to focus on hard hitting bombshell news, they prefer celebrity fluff or the average article from a local outlet about some stupid person doing something really stupid which really has no effect on our society. I'll leave for a couple hours and all the legitimate news threads get sliden off the front page by (((someone))). That's not a coincidence either, (((someone))) is always desperately trying to dumb down conversation and keep topics so mundane. Its the same dude who used to spam crab and indian poo threads I believe.
Google has become so unethical that even some of its own employees want nothing to do with it anymore. In the latest example of the company driving away valued workers, senior research scientist Jack Poulson has quit his job in protest of the company’s plans to launch a censored version of the Google search engine in China.
Last month, news emerged that Google was secretly working on a Chinese search app code-named Dragonfly for devices running Android. It removes any content that the Chinese government doesn’t want its people to see, such as that pertaining to free speech, human rights, democracy, and political dissidents. It will also see queries that have been deemed “sensitive” blacklisted entirely, meaning that no results whatsoever will turn up if people type in certain terms or phrases.
As part of the company’s research and machine intelligence department, Poulson was tasked with improving their search systems’ accuracy. He raised his concerns with his managers but ultimately decided that he couldn’t work for them any more in good conscience. He resigned at the end of last month, and he told The Intercept that at least four others have done the same.
He said that the plan was a violation of Google’s principles stating they will not design technologies “whose purpose contravenes widely accepted principles of international law and human rights.”
Not only was the censorship itself concerning, but he also had reservations about the fact that customer data would be hosted on the Chinese mainland, where the country’s security agencies would have access to it. Given what we know about what the Chinese government does to journalists and political activists it wants to silence, he’s right to be concerned about it.
Poulson told his bosses in his resignation letter: “I view our intent to capitulate to censorship and surveillance demands in exchange for access to the Chinese market as a forfeiture of our values and governmental negotiating position across the globe. There is an all-too-real possibility that other nations will attempt to leverage our actions in China in order to demand our compliance with their security demands.”
Poulson is hardly alone in his concerns. When the news of Dragonfly made its way throughout Google, there was a lot of protest within the company, with more than 1,400 employees signing a letter demanding the appointment of an ombudsman to assess the censorship plan’s “urgent moral and ethical issues.” They say they have a right to know what they’re working on. In other words, if Google is going to be carrying out unethical acts, they want no part of it.
Eric Schmidt on "Don't Be Evil" >Well, it was invented by Larry and Sergey. And the idea was that we don't quite know what evil is, but if we have a rule that says don't be evil, then employees can say, I think that's evil. Now, when I showed up, I thought this was the stupidest rule ever, because there's no book about evil except maybe, you know, the Bible or something. >So what happens is, I'm sitting in this meeting, and we're having this debate about an advertising product. And one of the engineers pounds his fists on the table and says, that's evil. And then the whole conversation stops, everyone goes into conniptions, and eventually we stopped the project. So it did work. https://www.neowin.net/news/eric-schmidt-googles-dont-be-evil-motto-is-the-stupidest-rule-ever
I can see why Eric Schmidt thought it was the 'stupidest rule ever' since like he said, it isn't well defined. Though 'do the right thing' isn't a great motto either... since who determines what is right?
Where the fuck were these people and their protesting when they were doing this kind of censorship to us domestically? But oh, it happens to chinks and now it's a big deal? Fuck them and their protest. A little too late.
>>12804 That's very true. As the article should have pointed out more clearly and accurately, they are censoring Google search results in America and Europe as well. Albeit I'm sure the Chinese censor much more content than we do here but still.
Schools are places of learning, reading, writing, and arithmetic. They are also a place for debate and open dialogue, but talking politics and government in Pennsylvania schools could be a thing of the past if one lawmaker gets his way.
Rep. Will Tallman, a Republican from Adams County, sent a memo to all 203 members of the House Friday pitching his proposal for what he’s dubbed the “Teacher Code of Ethics.”
That proposal contains a possible bill which would ban discussions in all kindergarten through 12-grade classrooms if approved.
“Our K-12 school teachers should not be using their classroom time spent on political or ideological indoctrination,” Tallman said in his memo. “Doing so takes time away from instruction in the academic foundation subjects of mathematics, science, English, history, and civics, and prevents our students from receiving a high-quality public education for careers in the global, high-tech economy.”
The potential bill has been met with strong opinions from people on both sides of the debate.
Some thought the proposal would prevent biased opinions from instructors with extreme ideas.
“The teachers shouldn’t be the ones to influence the students at any stage,” says one person in agreement with the proposed bill.
Drexel politics professor Bill Rosenberg says the idea is far-fetched and could be a disaster if ever implemented in Pennsylvania schools.
>>12805 That's the thing, history is often obfuscated by politics of the others' and this is why people like (((Rosenberg))) fear such legislation ever passing. They could no longer preach their leftist/Marxist politics in schools, nor could they keep on blaming the Nazis for everything (they do that too you know). Kids should attend school to learn actual curriculum, not be brainwashed by political propagandists.
"I'm a Bitch...no, a succubus." It's a game with audio and you can download the translation at the link below as an executable, or you can unzip it to see gallery. I deleted the old version of the thread because it's not a work in progress anymore.)
>>2386 The drawing ones where done by most likely a freemason literally drawing a little cartoon to justify calling something not a meme. That's why its drawn not because its a quirky thing because it is the only way they could sort of invalidate it as a meme. even drawing it as "it'll catch on soon enough" when that is so much more fucking forced than 2 circles. It doesn't matter if its a comic book type of thing snap out of it. People worried about circles and putting it on milhouse is much more forced than using the oathbreaker every now and then.